As for the late, unfortunate patsy, Arnis Zalkalns, many, many things about his pre-packaged back story simply do not add up - again, it may make perfect sense to the British public that "of course" some backward banana republic like Latvia would release a convicted murderer from jail after serving only 7 years of a 12 year sentence, and then give him a passport and not keep track of where he is or what he is up to, but to anyone who grew up inside the former Soviet Union, or any other authoritarian state bureaucracy, the idea of just loosing interest in supposedly violent criminals upon their release is just laughable and insulting all at once - one area of Soviet Society that was NEVER at risk of creeping institutional incompetence was offender management and corrections.
Having made the junket/wild goose chase over to the Baltic State, the Latvian Police ostensibly appear to be conducting themselves with far greater professional integrity than their British counterparts - the line being, he hasn't committed any crimes here, he's not on our radar, we're not concerned about him, and I can't tell you anything further than that about any criminal intelligence we may have on him, since you are not authorised to have it - its confidential.
Implicit also in that answer is the suggestion that had he re-entered Latvia, his passport would have been flagged upon arrival, so why are you here...? And since he has been charged with no crime in Britain and no European Arrest Warrant has been issued, why should we tell you anything.
The Mother of his dead wife provides just the sort of soundbites one would expect from the Mother of a murdered daughter who feels he is to blame - and, understanding the Stasi-esque and ever-present BBC guidelines, we see a recurring trend emerging in their carefully worded statements.
Everyone knows that to receive a murder conviction does not make you a murderer - it does not work like that.
Reality will not cleave to Man-Law, and men are flawed, imperfect and to make mistakes and to do wrong is in our nature, hard-wired in - in law, you can be a convicted murderer, but being a murderer in law does not infer that you are a murderer in fact.
The words (and tenses) that the BBC, and to a lesser extent the police use in reference to Arnis' conviction for the murder of his wife raise more questions than they purport to answer from only a superficial reading - they steer noticably clear from such declarative statements as "He is a convicted murderer"; rather, they use the form "he HAS a murder conviction", "he WAS convicted of murder", "he RECEIVED a murder conviction"....
The institutional history, culture, purpose and associated pathologies and prejudices make it very different, polar opposite in a great sense from other branches of the mass media in terms of it's THINKING and basic assumptions, if not it's conclusions. Whilst the commercial print media, finding it's most militant cadre in the Red Tops thrives on conflict and polarising controversy fueled by the lowest common denominator appeals to the most base, reptilian-cortex drives (some matrix of artificially stimulated fear, aggression, fucking and greed - emotional onananism), where facts get in the way of telling a "good" (most emotively provocative) story, the flabbier round the edges the better, the BBC, ever the epitome of the bureaucratic, neurotic, borderline autistic branch of the Civil Service it continues still to delude itself to this day that it actually isn't, is instead well-lawyered, linguistically and syntactically pedantic and legalistically precise in what it say, how it says it, and how fair it sounds as if it is being while saying it (note my use of the "as if" qualifyer in that last sentence, and you will understand precisely what I mean).
Like every school, local council and hospital in the country, the BBC is obsessively concerned and totally preoccupied in everything it does and says of any possible risk of getting sued. Even frivolously, by crazy people, golddiggers, ambulance-chasers, and people who are just plain wrong.
Something which made it a fertile soil and excessively amenable to and accepting of the deconstructionist thinking of the self-styled postmodernist school of philosophical thought;
I stress "self-styled", or "so-called", because this way of thinking and addressing concepts is not modern, it certainly doesn't follow after or proceed from modern thinking, it isn't a school, has no philosophy and is actively hostile to thought.
Postmodernism is a school of thought only in the sense that an actual school is a large, well-staffed brick box in which to store small children in during much of the day to prevent them from wandering off, exploring, having unique and unexpected novel experiences as a result of that and keep them closely confined within a tightly confined and proscribed space for the duration of their absence from home and parents, in a sort of bland, homogenised, human stable, or pig-pen, where a series of bored strangers will indoctrinate them with various clichés through repitition and rote. With chalk.
Postmodernism, again, like an actual school, has an unspoken bedrock taboo of institutionalised child molestation, and networks of organised paedophilia coarsing through it from deep below it's bland exterior, and it depends upon the social cloaking function of the taboo to ensure and support it's continued existence and accepted function and authority in the wider society, who doesn't see it it, can't conceived of it or just doesn't want to know and so never asks.
It is perhaps for this reason, more than any other single reason, or combination of reasons, that Postmodernist activists (I cannot say "thinkers") seek primarily not only to reinforce and strengthen all the existing, recognised and sincerely felt and held taboos present within any given society, but instead to actually proactively (and very aggressively), create, promote, polarise and then ultimately to stigmatise and eventually exclude from all popular conscious a whole array of entirely new Taboos, constructed from the ground up until they are existing in-place, Kabbalistically raised up into being, where none had existed previously; and then, by so-doing, create factionalism where no factions were to be found before, sectarianism from wholly synthetic and artificial sects that they themselves have just created out of a prior state of broad, cosmopolitan unity and to then sow the seeds of future conflict and reservoirs for all resentments and regress into tribalism by engaging in a continual process of excessive labelling and identification of any and all differences between people.
And then it becomes Child's Play to induce a constant, self-defeating state of perpetual animus by splitting them up as much as possible into the most reductionist, tiny little special-interest flag-waving demographic boxes, and then inflicting upon them the most mutually self-defeating externally-imposed coalitions, guaranteed to lock it's members and participants into a permanently insoluble and irreconcilable clash of agendas, goals, needs and priorities, which they themselves will actively embrace and accept in the hopelessly deluded understanding that what they are actually embracing represents solidarity, emboldened their strength and further extends their influence; whereas what it actually imposes a guarantee of continual betrayal, weakness and irresolution, that leads to their ever increasing irrelevance, exclusion and alienation.
What do I mean by this?
Every job application form must be accompanied (by law) by a voluntary equal opportunities monitoring declaration, so as to ensure non-discriminatory hiring practices and racially profile the unemployed.
The stated aim is to ensure that hiring decisions are purely meritorious and completely devoid of prejudice, with the ultimate noble goal of eliminating completely from the workplace the vile spectre of sexism, racism, ageism, heightism, lookism, phalocentrism, imperialism, neoinperialism, anti-Mormonism, Islamophobia, Judeophobia, Anti-Semtisim, borealocentrism, Gaulism, isolationism....
It is all-out low-intensity Jihad upon all the -ism, wherever they may be, offering no safe harbour, no quarter given, until the Earth is cleansed of the scourge of all -isms.
But not Capitalism, obviously. That goes without saying.
We knew how to deal with the likes of your sort when we were at war with the forces of International Communism...
[has anyone ever previously questioned the fact that though there is Islamophobia and there is Islamism, Judeophobia is (dishonestly, and inaccurately) called instead Anti-Semitism, and we are meant to accept as axiomatically true that even the idea of Judaicism is just conceptually paradoxical - the messaging - and why isn't it it Anti-Islamism (rather than Judeophobia), anyway? - here is pretty clear, it basically comes down eventually to this basic propostion - you decide for yourself if this was done by accident or design :
We are being told (in somewhat subtle, but plainly stark terms), the following is axiomatic and self-evidentially true in all but the rarest of cases, exceptions that must surely prove the rule:
1) Whilst all Muslims are firmly religious, not all Jews are religious, and indeed Jewish Identity and Jewishness is not primarily rooted in faith or religious conviction grown up out of the remarkably fertile ground to be had at the summit of Mount Sinai, but rather instead is a question of community (rather than race or ethnicity), since in fact most Jews are secular and well-assimilated, their Jewishness is instead a function of "tradition" and "culture" ("Whenever I hear the world 'culture', I reach for my revolver" - Hermann Goering) in the diaspora - a highly reactionary, explictly atheistic Blood and Soil arguement that allied itself with the forces of Imperialism, and which compensated (and still continues to do so to this day) for an initial striking absence any of Soil with an absolutely appalling deluge of Blood (largely other people), as a sacramental offering made to a god they profess not recognise, honour or profess true faith to, for giving freely to them something they had themselves just acquired by thievery, genocide, trickery, rapine, blackmail and murder for the SECOND time in recorded history, this time in directly contrary to their last set of instructions relayed to them from their deity, promising that he would himself deliver to them the land again, when, and only when, their lot of Attonement for having been kicked our the previous time was repaid in full. And not before, and until then, stay put and think about what your forefathers had done... So, basically,
2) Consistent with Herzel's atheistic, self-pitying nihilism (this tells us), the whole world hates/fears/resents/despises/oppresses The Jews, without exception, as a natural law or constant in human behaviour, provoked by the mere pressence of a Jew in the room, or a Jewish Ghetto in any city or society, irrespective of the particular conditions or prevailing social attitudes existing in that society, irrespective of the level of observance, piety, religious militancy, social activity or level of assimilation of the Jews in that country, that this tendency of mistrust and resentment in history was NATURAL, and INNATE in Gentiles, but this was in no way their choice or fault, the program was hard-wired into Gentile behaviour in the womb, and what is more, this fact indeed is in fact the Jewish People's FAULT, know how much everyone hates them, they should know better than to set up shop (in every sense) in somebody else's country rather than just clearing off and finding an empty one of their own in a desert or swamp somewhere. (But this has nothing to do with God, curses, covenants or the like)
Convictions can be (Thank God), and are overturned all the time, either on appeal or as a result of some form of executive clemency.
Mistakes (accidental or by design) are made, and more often than not create enormous problems and a source of considerable embarrassment and expense to the constituted authorities when they must be rectified - authority, as Machiaveli reminds us, must never lose face or risk losing it's authority.
But likewise, he further reminds us that a mistake only ever becomes an error if one does not act to correct it - if "the system works" by catching and rectifying earlier mistakes or missteps of the justice system, any benefit gained by satisfying and resolving those missteps does little to offset the considerable loss of face it produces but exposing it's previous blunders and injustices and airing old and forgotten examples of it's previous inefficiency, corruption and incompetence once more and to the public - consequently, these questions, wherever they arise, tend to be resolved as discreetly and quietly as can be.
In other words, when the wrong man has been locked up for years, they generally do a deal to make the problem go away.
Two recent examples of this are the conviction, imprisonment and subsequent release and repatriation (behind the backs of the Scottish Government, who were not trusted to go along with it, or not to leak it by Whitehall) of Abelset al-Megrahi, the completely innocent former agent of the Libyan Secret Service jailed after a public show-trial for the bombing of Pan-Am 103 over Lockerbie; it's also highly likely that MI5 poisoned him somehow in prison, hoping he was expire of "natural causes" with terminal, galloping cancer (of the Jack Rubenstein variety) before his pending judicial appeal, and the Libyan people quite rightly hailed him upon his return as both a national hero and living martyr for the remainder of his life.
Likewise, the so-called Robin Hood Murders of May 1993 are still (officially) a solved and closed tripple child murder case from the point of view of the State of Arkansas, even though the true killer is well-known to thousands worldwide and has never been charged, and remains at liberty today - with a survival narrative that Ellie Weisel would have given his eye teeth for, local neighbourhood Goth and student of Thelema, Damian Echols clawed his way back from a triple death sentence conviction for capital murder, along with his childhood friend Jason Baldwin and junior highschool classmate Jessie Lloyd Misskelly Jr. following the discovery of exculpatory DNA evidence pinning the crimes solidly on the true perpetrator (and yes, the person who did the killing was a family member). Realising that legally and morally, they had not a leg to stand on, but further realising the legal and psychic cost of further continuing their stonewall tactic of total obstructionism, the State of Arkansas leveraged their almost infinite capacity to further obstruct justice to broker a deal; in their terms, the criminal and judicial equivalent of a no-blame divorce, offering release the West Memphis Three immediately, re-sentencing all three men (boys, at the time) to time-served, conditional on all three (this is the Prisoner's Dilemna, writ large) entering in a guilty plea for the triple homicide of mutilated children everyone knows that they did not commit; thereby waiving any right to sue for damages or wrongful imprisonment, violation of the civil rights, the bringing of criminal complaints against individual officers or officials, and ensuring that the casefile closed in 1994 remained-so, and that State and county authorities would not once again have a 20 year old unsolved set of triple murders back in the slate, which they would be obliged to actively re-investigate, exposing them to risk of further exposure and outside scrutiny.
7 years is not a very long time to spend in prison for a crime that is clearly described in terms of being premeditated first degree murder.
Most murders that happen are committed by a family member, they occur in the home, and usually happen in the course of, or resulting from a backdrop of habitual abuse and domestic violence.
It's not domestic violence if you make your spouse journey out with you into the middle of the woods in the dead of night (which implies kidnap, or at least coercion to get them to go with you), and then bludgeon them to death in some sort of jealous fit.
That's the act of a psychopath, and nothing about this person's subsequent new life post-release suggests any hint of such an imbalance, both his brother, and the mother of his two year old child (who knew NOTHING of his previous conviction and incarceration in Latvia until after Arnis' own disappearance and death, first learning it from the ever-responsible and compassionate British Media) describing him, with obvious sincerity as both "a good man", and "a wonderful father".
If it's not yet obvious, I don't think he killed his wife, I think it's pretty clear that the Latvians (apart from the Witchy ex-mother-in-law) don't think that he killed his wife or anyone else (but are hand-tied in their ability to actually clearly say so), and I think that the Metropolitan Police and their crony tabloid fellow travelers know that too damn well, and are exploiting that gap of uncertainty to the hilt in order to craft their expertly framed and managed fit-up of a dead man with murky past that looks worse on paper.
Serious students of the Kennedy Assassination may note that one of the aspects that stands out most clearly from the record of the subsequent cover-up and how the whole matter was orchestrated from The Top after the fact, with the pieces being moved into position by any number of unseen hands is to listen to the tapes of FBI Director Hoover (33rd Degree Grand Inspector General in the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Mother Supreme Council of the World, Abdullah of the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine) when he has to explain to President Lyndon Johnson (Blue Level Entered Apprentice, 1st Degree Southern Jurisdiction Scottish Rite, Johnson City, Tx Lodge No. 561) who exactly Jack Ruby (Blue Level Chicago Outfit Made-Guy, B'nai Brith) was.
The FBI, as Hoover was fond of reminding Martin King amongst others, is not a Police Force, does not prosecute criminals or groups, and had no military or paramilitary function (ignore Waco) - as befits an agency with such truly Masonic origins, they exist to gather information (admissible, and inadmissible in court), report gossip, start rumours, make cases, develop criminal intelligence (and counterintelligence) through a complex interlocking network of informants and (firstly, always and only) to get all the names.
Johnson, who to all practical intents and purposes, just like Winston Churchill, was a non-Mason, recognised the value, indeed the necessity of having a top Mason as his right-hand man if he ever hoped to govern the country in any real or meaningful sense - as he actually did say of Hoover in 1967, "I prefer not to have him be outside of the tent pissing in", knowing damn well that if you fired the top Mason in the country, that doesn't mean that he will actually go away or lose any influence, you've just kicked in a nest of hornets for no good reason and to no real benefit or advantage.
And besides - having well over a million American Masons that all want to be your friend is hardly a nuisance.
But how Brother Edgar explained Jack Ruby to Johnson, and who he was in life, without ever resorting to cliché or innuendo speaks volumes for how these things actually work behind closed doors and strictly off the record, as every sincerely felt plot must be - "This man, Rubenstein, he's known to the Dallas Police, he's known to the authorities down there in Dallas... Street-fighter, he's a brawler, got a bad record...;"
Again, serious scholars of the Kennedy case and of Deep State politics will recall that Mr. Jack Rubenstein of Chicago was formally on record a full 15 years earlier as being an informant, a protected source, a friendly and highly accommodating witness not only to Hoover's FBI, but on a personal basis to Congressman Richard M. Nixon of California, who gratefully acknowledged the great value of his cooperation with the House UnAmerican Activities Committee (HUAC) in exposing the extent of attempts at Communist infiltration and subversion of the Chicago Waste Handler's Union; Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pope John Paul I all had one trait in common, and that was their virulent anti-Masonry and recognition of the need to suppress it in all it's forms as rival, highly clandestine centre of wealth, power and intruige in their respective societies, and as such, Dick Nixon, Jack Ruby, Director Hoover and the Grand Wizard of the KKK were all on the same page - Omertà most certainly did not extend to Commies, and since their own respective understands of American values/the Mob Code of Ethics/Rabbinical Teachings/Bureau Standards of "Proper Conduct and Behaviour"/Klan self-image, to each of them exactly coincided with their own understanding of American Identity, to inform on a Red was an act of Patriotism - as the invasions of Sicily and the Domican Republic, and the attempted invasion of Cuba demonstrated absolutely beyond any doubt, the Mafia were absolutely falling over themselves, and overflowing with sheer enthusiasm at the prospect of working for Uncle Sam whenever the possibility arose to strike back and wage war upon the forces of World Anti-Masonry.
The late John Judge put it this way : "You can't have organised crime and organised policing exist together in the same society unless they're working together" - and that's exactly right, and the evidence is all around for all to see, it just rarely breaks cover, except when the strategic tension of fear (real or synthetic) of either real, imagined or falsified violence, or threat of same is required to place the masses of the populace back onto a defensive mental footing - Operation Chaos is what I am referring to, it's everywhere in the media, permeating the Zeitgeist and it's name is well-met.
But only really those of us who began refusing television, television news and free and national newspapers can see and recognise upon sight the interference patterns of the memes as they glide through the collective unconscious of our fellow citizens like a poorly-cloaked Rommulan Warbird, silent and armed to the fucking teeth, yet inelegant, clumsy and over-confident.
In the Matrix, (Lu)Cypher studies the collective delusion of the Machines' simulated world from afar, one step dissociated from the "real world" experience and sensory perception of the unwoken masses of humanity by watching the code flood past his eyes on the screen, recognising the familiar and meaningful patterns of blondes, agents, redheads etc. by excluding all the extrainious and distracting data not relevant to his task that only can get in the way and divert him from the goal of his current tasks by testing his will, and obscuring from him his purpose for being there; this world at arm's length cannot hurt him, experienced in this way, so objectively and at a safe distance, but neither can it surprise him, enthrall him, or endanger him; and any man who would sell his own soul for a lifetime of imaginary steaks and pretend fine wines clearly has a deeply addictive personality, so perhaps that's really for the best, and he probably needs to start attending regular meetings, or have an intervention or two.
The point is, just because you don't immediately see it, doesn't mean it's not there, and isn't prepared to hurt you, lie to you, dispose of you, kill you or otherwise injure you, or your family, loved-ones, along with almost anyone and everyone it wants in order protect itself, it's privilage, it's footsoldiers and it's secrets.
Conspiracies, Secret Orders and Shadow Governments do exist, and impact every facet of all our daily lives, and that doesn't have to imply shape-shifting Lizard People, Jewish/Jesuit/Polish/Commie/Liberal plots for Mind War, Global Corporatism and World Governance (although all of those things do of course exist, and they do occur - just not always as-advertised or where and how you might expect...), paranoid delusions of mass hysteria or Lunar Denialism - just the simple, uncomplicated and uncontroversial premise that politicians will lie when they don't expect to get caught, those who covet power and influence over others have essentially self-serving motivational drives and that Scientists, Doctors, England Football Managers and Clergymen all live in mortal dread and secret dread of the thought of anyone outside of their own respective professions forming the opinion that they don't have a clue as to what he or she are doing, it's all just hot-air, waffle and a load of all bollocks that they just make up as they go along (just like the rest of us), they're just too proud to ask for (or indeed, accept) any help or assistance from any "non-experts", outside of the field, not properly credentialed and accredited with the proper pieces of paper from the correct institutions that they respect and defer and look up to.... Not realising ever that they defer and look up to these people because that's what underscores everything that they've ever been taught and matches precisely with everything they have been conditioned to think and accept, how they have been trained to reason and to think, the sorts of conclusions they have always been expected to reach, what they have been generally (and completely) been led to expect, and more pointedly, to accept, as well as the basic assumption that underline such standards of behaviour, thinking and public expressions of belief, conjecture and speculation.
Speaking very broadly, certain things are generally expected (and so reality will typically either conform, or be made to conform to those collective expectations, and likewise, certain ideas, concepts or schools of thought, are generally held to be either accepted, acceptable or unacceptable.
Of course, the fact that something is considered to be unacceptable does not mean that it is untrue, or not to be expected, and therefore allowed-for, with planning and preparation on the part of those affected (or afflicted) by that which is held to be generally unacceptable - for while it me be SOCIALLY unacceptable (more often referred to as being somehow "not appropriate", by way of euphemism), the fact that those aspects of reality either fall short or fail to achieve mass acceptance does not make them in any sense objectively less real or less true, or less affective (or effective) to those effected (or affected) by that reality or by the nature and character of those truths, they just fail to perceive (for they lack the capacity to make the connection in their understanding of the world between effect and cause.
The effect, they feel, because it is a visceral and immediate aspect of their perception, present or directly inferred within their sensory experience. But when the cause is unseen, un-guessed or unknown in their immediate perception of the world, it gets attributed instead to blind chance, pure happenstance or coincidence, that fallacious quality and aspect of nature that we call "Fate", or more pompously to the hopelessly self-deluded egomaniacs, "Destiny".
